Skip to main content

State Board of Behavioral Health Licensure (2024-18A)

Wednesday, March 13, 2024

Eric Ashmore, Executive Director
State Board of Behavioral Health Licensure 
3815 N. Santa Fe, Ste. 110 
Oklahoma City, OK 73118 

    Re: Beatty, Case No. 2023-LPC-371 

Dear Director Ashmore: 

This office has received your request for a written Attorney General Opinion regarding action that the State Board of Behavioral Health Licensure intends to take with respect to the Licensed Professional Counselor Beatty. 

The Licensed Professional Counselors Act (“Act”) authorizes the Board to revoke the license of a person who has “[e]ngaged in fraud or deceit in connection with services rendered . . .”; “[e]ngaged in unprofessional conduct as defined by the rules established by the Board”; and “[e]ngaged in negligent or wrongful actions in the performance of his or her duties.” 59 O.S.2021, § 1912(A)(2, 4-5).1 Additionally, the Act allows the Board to assess an administrative penalty for any person who has violation any provision of the Act. 59 O.S.2021, § 1913.1(B). 

In August 2023, Respondent pled guilty to (1) Medicare Fraud; and (2) Identity Theft. and was sentenced to a three-year deferred sentence, prevented from billing Medicaid for the duration of the sentence and ordered to pay restitution and other costs. Finding clear and convincing evidence of grounds for discipline under 59 O.S.2021, § 1912(A)(2, 4-5), the Board proposes to revoke Respondent’s license and assess an administrative penalty of $1,000. The Board may reasonably believe that the proposed action is necessary to deter future violations and to protect the public. 

It is, therefore, the official opinion of the Attorney General that the State Board of Behavioral Health Licensure has adequate support for the conclusion that this action advances the State’s policy to uphold standards of professionalism among behavioral practitioners. 

ROB JOHNSON
General Counsel 

*The office amended this opinion following issuance to remove language stating that Respondent failed to cooperate with the Nursing Board’s investigation. The Board of Nursing brought this to the office’s attention. On review of documents produced, the office confirmed that the Board did not list failure to cooperate as a ground for discipline in the above-captioned matter. 

1Unprofessional conduct includes “conduct detrimental to the public interest,” and “making [CDS] drugs available without authority to self, friends, or family members.” OAC 485:10-11-1(b)(3)(H), (P). 

2Conduct which jeopardizes a patient’s life, health or safety includes “[f]ailure to utilize appropriate judgment in administering safe nursing practice or patient care assignment.” OAC 485:10-11-1(b)(4)(D).  

Last Modified on Jan 06, 2025