OFFICIAL RESULTS
Multicounty Races
Special Election — November 14, 2017
Results by entity and office for all local races that span multiple counties.
Results as of: 12/7/2017 6:07:57 PM
PROPOSITION NO. 1 BATTIEST PUBLIC SCHOOLS
7 of 7 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 3 | 0 | 138 | 141 | 84.43% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 1 | 0 | 25 | 26 | 15.57% |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 163 | 167 |
PROPOSITION NO. 2 BATTIEST PUBLIC SCHOOLS
7 of 7 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 3 | 0 | 140 | 143 | 85.12% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 1 | 0 | 24 | 25 | 14.88% |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 164 | 168 |
PROPOSITION BRIDGE CREEK PUBLIC SCHOOLS
5 of 5 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 14 | 2 | 386 | 402 | 70.28% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 25 | 0 | 145 | 170 | 29.72% |
| Total | 39 | 2 | 531 | 572 |
PROPOSITION CITY OF BIXBY
14 of 14 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 23 | 2 | 114 | 139 | 72.02% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 8 | 0 | 46 | 54 | 27.98% |
| Total | 31 | 2 | 160 | 193 |
PROPOSITION NO. 1 CITY OF SAND SPRINGS
17 of 17 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 47 | 17 | 1,016 | 1,080 | 69.68% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 15 | 7 | 448 | 470 | 30.32% |
| Total | 62 | 24 | 1,464 | 1,550 |
PROPOSITION NO. 2 CITY OF SAND SPRINGS
17 of 17 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 46 | 17 | 972 | 1,035 | 66.69% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 16 | 7 | 494 | 517 | 33.31% |
| Total | 62 | 24 | 1,466 | 1,552 |
PROPOSITION NO. 3 CITY OF SAND SPRINGS
17 of 17 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 39 | 17 | 916 | 972 | 62.51% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 23 | 7 | 553 | 583 | 37.49% |
| Total | 62 | 24 | 1,469 | 1,555 |
PROPOSITION NO. 4 CITY OF SAND SPRINGS
17 of 17 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 40 | 13 | 865 | 918 | 62.07% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 19 | 9 | 533 | 561 | 37.93% |
| Total | 59 | 22 | 1,398 | 1,479 |
PROPOSITION NO. 5 CITY OF SAND SPRINGS
17 of 17 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 35 | 12 | 818 | 865 | 58.45% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 24 | 10 | 581 | 615 | 41.55% |
| Total | 59 | 22 | 1,399 | 1,480 |
PROPOSITION NO. 1 CITY OF TULSA
192 of 192 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 773 | 184 | 7,334 | 8,291 | 79.61% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 164 | 50 | 1,909 | 2,123 | 20.39% |
| Total | 937 | 234 | 9,243 | 10,414 |
PROPOSITION NO. 2 CITY OF TULSA
192 of 192 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 815 | 186 | 7,828 | 8,829 | 84.35% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 132 | 47 | 1,459 | 1,638 | 15.65% |
| Total | 947 | 233 | 9,287 | 10,467 |
PROPOSITION NO. 3 CITY OF TULSA
192 of 192 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 740 | 166 | 6,503 | 7,409 | 71.31% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 198 | 64 | 2,719 | 2,981 | 28.69% |
| Total | 938 | 230 | 9,222 | 10,390 |
PROPOSITION NO. 4 CITY OF TULSA
192 of 192 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 814 | 185 | 7,180 | 8,179 | 78.46% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 129 | 47 | 2,070 | 2,246 | 21.54% |
| Total | 943 | 232 | 9,250 | 10,425 |
PROPOSITION NO. 5 CITY OF TULSA
192 of 192 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 705 | 157 | 6,054 | 6,916 | 66.44% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 230 | 76 | 3,187 | 3,493 | 33.56% |
| Total | 935 | 233 | 9,241 | 10,409 |
PROPOSITION NO. 6 CITY OF TULSA
192 of 192 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 745 | 174 | 6,049 | 6,968 | 67.78% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 180 | 53 | 3,079 | 3,312 | 32.22% |
| Total | 925 | 227 | 9,128 | 10,280 |
PROPOSITION NO. 7 CITY OF TULSA
192 of 192 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 713 | 132 | 5,757 | 6,602 | 64.46% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 211 | 94 | 3,335 | 3,640 | 35.54% |
| Total | 924 | 226 | 9,092 | 10,242 |
PROPOSITION NO. 1 GERONIMO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
6 of 6 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 2 | 5 | 231 | 238 | 73.91% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 1 | 1 | 82 | 84 | 26.09% |
| Total | 3 | 6 | 313 | 322 |
PROPOSITION NO. 2 GERONIMO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
6 of 6 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 2 | 5 | 240 | 247 | 76.23% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 1 | 1 | 75 | 77 | 23.77% |
| Total | 3 | 6 | 315 | 324 |
Results as of: 12/7/2017 6:07:57 PM
