- Adair
- Alfalfa
- Atoka
- Beaver
- Beckham
- Blaine
- Bryan
- Caddo
- Canadian
- Carter
- Cherokee
- Choctaw
- Cimarron
- Cleveland
- Coal
- Comanche
- Cotton
- Craig
- Creek
- Custer
- Delaware
- Dewey
- Ellis
- Garfield
- Garvin
- Grady
- Grant
- Greer
- Harmon
- Harper
- Haskell
- Hughes
- Jackson
- Jefferson
- Johnston
- Kay
- Kingfisher
- Kiowa
- Latimer
- LeFlore
- Lincoln
- Logan
- Love
- McClain
- McCurtain
- McIntosh
- Major
- Marshall
- Mayes
- Murray
- Muskogee
- Noble
- Nowata
- Okfuskee
- Oklahoma
- Okmulgee
- Osage
- Ottawa
- Pawnee
- Payne
- Pittsburg
- Pontotoc
- Pottawatomie
- Pushmataha
- Roger Mills
- Rogers
- Seminole
- Sequoyah
- Stephens
- Texas
- Tillman
- Tulsa
- Wagoner
- Washington
- Washita
- Woods
- Woodward
OFFICIAL RESULTS
All Races by County
Runoff Primary Election — August 26, 2014
County results of all races by entity and office.
Results as of: 10/27/2014 8:59:52 AM
TULSA
FEDERAL, STATE AND COUNTY
FOR SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION
Democrat
262 of 262 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| JOHN COX | 328 | 141 | 4,575 | 5,044 | 55.8% |
| FREDA DESKIN | 378 | 114 | 3,511 | 4,003 | 44.2% |
| Total | 706 | 255 | 8,086 | 9,047 |
FEDERAL, STATE AND COUNTY
FOR UNITED STATES SENATOR (UNEXPIRED TERM)
Democrat
262 of 262 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| CONNIE JOHNSON | 501 | 211 | 5,976 | 6,688 | 74.6% |
| JIM ROGERS | 201 | 41 | 2,040 | 2,282 | 25.4% |
| Total | 702 | 252 | 8,016 | 8,970 |
FEDERAL, STATE AND COUNTY
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 29
Republican
2 of 2 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| JAMES LEEWRIGHT | 4 | 4 | 95 | 103 | 59.2% |
| DANI THOMPSON-FIELDS | 4 | 3 | 64 | 71 | 40.8% |
| Total | 8 | 7 | 159 | 174 |
FEDERAL, STATE AND COUNTY
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 69
Republican
15 of 15 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| MELISSA ABDO | 84 | 34 | 1,141 | 1,259 | 47.7% |
| CHUCK STROHM | 59 | 21 | 1,298 | 1,378 | 52.3% |
| Total | 143 | 55 | 2,439 | 2,637 |
FEDERAL, STATE AND COUNTY
FOR DISTRICT ATTORNEY DISTRICT 14
Republican
262 of 262 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| STEVE KUNZWEILER | 749 | 212 | 10,922 | 11,883 | 55.8% |
| FRED JORDAN | 439 | 197 | 8,776 | 9,412 | 44.2% |
| Total | 1,188 | 409 | 19,698 | 21,295 |
CITY OF BROKEN ARROW
PROPOSITION NO. 1 CITY OF BROKEN ARROW
35 of 35 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 122 | 42 | 3,585 | 3,749 | 66.9% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 68 | 10 | 1,780 | 1,858 | 33.1% |
| Total | 190 | 52 | 5,365 | 5,607 |
CITY OF BROKEN ARROW
PROPOSITION NO. 2 CITY OF BROKEN ARROW
35 of 35 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 106 | 39 | 3,307 | 3,452 | 61.7% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 82 | 13 | 2,052 | 2,147 | 38.3% |
| Total | 188 | 52 | 5,359 | 5,599 |
CITY OF BROKEN ARROW
PROPOSITION NO. 3 CITY OF BROKEN ARROW
35 of 35 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 100 | 35 | 3,093 | 3,228 | 57.8% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 88 | 17 | 2,251 | 2,356 | 42.2% |
| Total | 188 | 52 | 5,344 | 5,584 |
CITY OF BROKEN ARROW
PROPOSITION NO. 4 CITY OF BROKEN ARROW
35 of 35 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 93 | 33 | 2,800 | 2,926 | 52.4% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 97 | 18 | 2,540 | 2,655 | 47.6% |
| Total | 190 | 51 | 5,340 | 5,581 |
CITY OF BROKEN ARROW
PROPOSITION NO. 5 CITY OF BROKEN ARROW
35 of 35 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 121 | 40 | 3,546 | 3,707 | 66.2% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 68 | 12 | 1,816 | 1,896 | 33.8% |
| Total | 189 | 52 | 5,362 | 5,603 |
CITY OF BROKEN ARROW
PROPOSITION NO. 6 CITY OF BROKEN ARROW
35 of 35 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 89 | 33 | 2,769 | 2,891 | 53.7% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 95 | 17 | 2,383 | 2,495 | 46.3% |
| Total | 184 | 50 | 5,152 | 5,386 |
CITY OF BROKEN ARROW
PROPOSITION NO. 7 CITY OF BROKEN ARROW
35 of 35 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 85 | 34 | 2,647 | 2,766 | 51.4% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 96 | 16 | 2,504 | 2,616 | 48.6% |
| Total | 181 | 50 | 5,151 | 5,382 |
CITY OF BROKEN ARROW
PROPOSITION NO. 8 CITY OF BROKEN ARROW
35 of 35 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 101 | 29 | 1,971 | 2,101 | 38.9% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 82 | 21 | 3,192 | 3,295 | 61.1% |
| Total | 183 | 50 | 5,163 | 5,396 |
CITY OF SAPULPA
PROPOSITION NO. 1 CITY OF SAPULPA
2 of 2 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
CITY OF SAPULPA
PROPOSITION NO. 2 CITY OF SAPULPA
2 of 2 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
CITY OF SAPULPA
PROPOSITION NO. 3 CITY OF SAPULPA
2 of 2 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
CITY OF SAPULPA
PROPOSITION NO. 4 CITY OF SAPULPA
2 of 2 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
CITY OF SAPULPA
PROPOSITION NO. 5 CITY OF SAPULPA
2 of 2 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
CITY OF SAPULPA
PROPOSITION NO. 6 CITY OF SAPULPA
2 of 2 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
CITY OF SAPULPA
PROPOSITION NO. 7 CITY OF SAPULPA
2 of 2 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
CITY OF SAPULPA
PROPOSITION NO. 8 CITY OF SAPULPA
2 of 2 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
CITY OF SAPULPA
PROPOSITION NO. 9 CITY OF SAPULPA
2 of 2 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
CITY OF SAPULPA
PROPOSITION NO. 10 CITY OF SAPULPA
2 of 2 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
CITY OF SAPULPA
PROPOSITION NO. 11 CITY OF SAPULPA
2 of 2 Precincts Completely Reporting
| ABSENTEE |
EARLY VOTING |
ELECTION DAY |
TOTAL |
||
| FOR THE PROPOSITION - YES | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
| AGAINST THE PROPOSITION - NO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Results as of: 10/27/2014 8:59:52 AM
